Healthcare worker HPV vaccine confidence Other
Conditions
Interventions
The two interventions entail tailored and concrete strategies to build vaccine confidence among Nigerian healthcare workers - using a digital format, and an in-person format. The intervention aims to
arm b) in person facilitated sessions within the health facility. The content and implementation approach for both arms is being co-designed with healthcare workers in Jigawa and Oyo states, with the
Sponsors
Karolinska Institutet
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthcare workers who are employed within study facilities 2. Provide direct clinical services and includes community healthcare workers and assistants. ? ? 3. Aged 18 years and older 4. Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Temporary staff who are not employed at the facility 2. <18 years old 3. Unable to provide consent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Proportion of healthcare workers who self-report engaging with the intervention content – either receiving information through digital channels or taking part in face-to-face sessions measured using qualitative interviews at endline | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Acceptability of the intervention: 1.1 Proportion of healthcare workers employed in intervention facilities who have viewed at least one digital message is measured using endline survey at endline 1.2 Proportion of healthcare workers employed in intervention facilities who have taken part in an in-person session is measured using endline survey at endline 1.3 Mean number of digital messages that healthcare workers employed at intervention facilities have viewed is measured using endline survey at endline 1.4 Mean number of in-person sessions attended by healthcare workers employed at intervention facilities is measured using endline survey at endline 1.5 Number of views/likes that individual digital messages receive is measured using implementation monitoring at endline 1.6 Number and content of messages sent in digital discussions is measured using implementation monitoring at endline 1.7 Participatory engagement with the in-person intervention sessions is measured using implementation monitoring at endline 1.8 Content of in-person intervention sessions is measured using implementation monitoring at endline 1.9 Reasons for not engaging with the intervention is measured using qualitative interviews at endline 1.10 Perceptions of the intervention is measured using qualitative interviews at endline 2. Feasibility of intervention: 2.1 Proportion of healthcare workers that own a phone that can support the digital intervention is measured using endline survey at endline 2.2 Proportion of healthcare workers in intervention and control facilities that have the digital delivery platform installed on their phone is measured using endline survey at endline 2.3 Extra healthcare worker time needed to engage in the intervention is measured using endline survey at endline 2.4 Perception of the intervention burden, including network cost, compensation and task shifting is measured using qualitative interviews at endline 3. Feasibility of cRCT design: 3.1 Proportion of facilit | — |
Countries
Nigeria
Contacts
Public ContactSibylle ;Adegoke G Herzig van Wees;Falade
;
Outcome results
None listed