Skip to content

Feasibility of the adapted LiFE (aLiFE) intervention – a pilot study

Feasibility of the adapted Lifestyle-integrated Exercise (aLiFE) Programme for improving functional performance and increasing physical activity in young older adults: a multicentre pilot study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN37750605
Enrollment
30
Registered
2016-05-03
Start date
2016-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Preventing functional decline in older adults Other

Interventions

The adapted Lifestyle-integrated Exercise (aLiFE) programme is an adapted version of the LiFE programme developed by Clemson et al. (BMJ 2012
345:e4547). aLiFE includes strength, balance, and physical activities integrated in everyday life, so that the activities can be performed in natural settings multiple times throughout the day. The aL

Sponsors

Robert-Bosch Hospital Stuttgart (Germany)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Community dwelling men and women at age 60 to 70 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Inability to walk 500 meters without aid 2. Cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MOCA =24 points) 3. Existence of severe cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, or mental disease where exercise is contraindicated 4. Attending organised exercise classes more than twice a week and/or not exercising more than 2 hours on their own each week

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Feasibility of aLiFE as defined by: 1. Willingness to participate 2. Adherence 3. Possible harms 4. Acceptability (rating of helpfulness, safety, level of difficulty, and adaptability) 5. Participants’ views on: 5.1. Planning and engaging in aLiFE activities 5.2. The aLiFE manual 5.3. Support from the trainers 5.4. Their ideas for improving the programme (semi-structured interviews)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Appropriateness of balance scales in the population of young old adults (ceiling effects, reliability)

Countries

Germany, Netherlands, Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jun 27, 2026