Skip to content

Perforated punctal plug as an alternative to the three snip punctoplasty for the treatment of acquired lacrimal punctum stenosis

Perforated Punctal Plug as an alternative to the three snip punctoplasty for the treatment of acquired lacrimal punctum stenosis: the POPPY study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN35702916
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-09-12
Start date
2017-09-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Specialty: Ophthalmology, Primary sub-specialty: Other

Interventions

Randomisation is computer generated sequential binary randomisation in blocks of 10. Punctal plugs treatment arm: Perforated punctal plugs, coated with a thin layer of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) sil
with the lower eyelid on lateral stretch, the punctum and proximal canaliculus is dilated with a Nettleship dilator. The PPP is inserted soon after dilatation. The inserter is held between the thumb a

Sponsors

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age = 18 years (men and women) 2. Epiphora as a result of acquired punctal stenosis of lower lids 3. Full patency on lacrimal syringing 4. Willing to undergo a procedural intervention 5. Willing and able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. History of congenital punctal stenosis 2. History of punctal stenosis associated with chemotherapy 3. Completely stenosed or occluded punctum 4. Abnormality on lacrimal syringing 5. Moderate or severe lower eyelid laxity or eyelid malposition 6. Use of eye drops, other than lubricants, within the past 3 months or planned in the study eye during the course of the trial 7. Eyelid or ocular surgery within the past 3 months or planned surgery in the study eye, during the course of the trial 8. Planned chemotherapy during the course of the trial 9. Planned nasal or sinus surgery during the course of the trial 10. Any other condition or situation that, in the opinion of the investigator, may prevent the participant complying with the study or follow-up procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Estimated number of times eye has watered in the past week, as assessed by questions 2 and 3 in the Imperial Watery Eye Quality of Life Questionnaire at baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Effect of watering on quality of life, assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale as part of the watery eye quality of life questionnaire (Appendix 6), at 12 months post procedure; in the case of PPPs this will be 12 months post plug removal. 2. Slit lamp examination of punctum. A punctum size of Grade 3-5, as defined on the visual grading system by Kashkouli et al, (Appendix 4) will be considered successful 3. Slit lamp examination of tear meniscus. A tear meniscus greater than 0.3mm will be considered raised, a secondary measure of anatomical failure. 4. OCT of lacrimal punctum. There are not sufficient normative databases in the literature to use as a reference but we will compare figures pre- and post-operatively to assess the effect of the treatments and to assess the utility of OCT as a tool for analysing puncta

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026