Skip to content

Use of facial monitoring technology for recording vital signs in the emergency department waiting room: a feasibility study

FacED: facial vital signs recording in ED

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN35674891
Enrollment
10000
Registered
2025-12-08
Start date
2025-05-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-02-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult walk-in patients in the Emergency Department (ED) and ED staff Other

Interventions

1. Patient-level data capture (vital signs recording) Patients arriving at the ED will be approached by a member of the research team and screened for eligibility before being given information about

Sponsors

St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient participant inclusion criteria: 1. ‘Walk-in’ adult patients aged =18 years at one of St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust's urgent care centres (Emergency Department, Urgent Treatment Centre ?or Enhanced Primary Care Hub) 2. Has access to own smartphone 3. Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study Staff participant inclusion criteria: 1. Clinical ED staff who work in a triage or initial assessment role in ED

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patient participant exclusion criteria 1. Clinical condition warranting immediate or urgent medical assessment Staff participant exclusion criteria: 1. Unwilling to complete questionnaire

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Measured at a single timepoint: 1. Feasibility: defined as the proportion of patients consented who were able to complete the vital signs recording using patientcheck.in 2. Acceptability of self-recorded vital signs (patients): self-assessment using the single-ease question (SEQ) and the system usability scale (SUS) and self-reported technical affinity

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measured at a single timepoint: 1. Acceptability of digital health technology (patients): electronic survey of perceived patient acceptability of smartphone use as part of their care 2. Acceptability (staff): electronic survey of usability constructs based on the Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale 3. Performance: reliability of the platform to accurately measure the vital signs will be measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactKathryn;Jared Willis;Charlton-Webb

;

kathryn.willis@stgeorges.nhs.uk;Jared.CharltonWebb@stgeorges.nhs.uk+44 7926088415;-

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026