Physical activity in people who have had a stroke Nervous System Diseases Stroke
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Stroke survivors: 1. Adult community dwelling stroke survivors 2. Currently receiving outpatient/community stroke rehabilitation in the study catchment area 3. Capacity to provide informed consent 4. Capability to undertake a supported self-management physical activity intervention programme (e.g. not requiring high levels of hands on therapy for function) 5. Agreement by the therapist and patient that there is capacity for increased activity/less sedentary behaviour Healthcare professionals: 1. Currently working as a healthcare professional (e.g. physiotherapists, occupational therapists and rehabilitation assistants) delivering home/community based stroke rehabilitation 2. Capacity and willingness to undertake intervention training, delivery and assessment throughout study duration 3. Ability to deliver the intervention programme to up to five stroke survivors
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Stroke survivors: 1. Contraindications for undertaking physical activity e.g. presence of unstable heart disease 2. Advised by GP/Consultant not to undertake physical activity for health reasons
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The overall aim of this study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of a theory- and evidence-based multifaceted behaviour change intervention targeting free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour after stroke. In order to assess the feasibility, acceptability and fidelity of the intervention the following outcomes will be collected at the baseline and at the review: 1. Stroke survivor and healthcare professional study recruitment and attrition rates, calculated as rate per month 2. Feasibility of intervention delivery, described using: 2.1. The number of and time taken (minutes) for face-to-face/telephone intervention delivery 2.2. The application of the different intervention components applied (e.g. self-monitoring tools, activity selection) 2.3. Safety reporting 3. Completeness of baseline and review descriptive data to determine the feasibility of the inclusion criteria and of potential outcome measures. Baseline demographics will be collected and at baseline and reviews (the timing of the reviews is individualised to the participant) the following measures will be made: 3.1. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale 3.2. Fatigue Assessment Scale 3.3. Rivermead Mobility Assessment 4. Views of stroke survivors and healthcare professionals on the acceptability of the intervention and study protocol, assessed using a questionnaire and interview 5. Fidelity of delivery, receipt and enactment of the intervention, assessed through analysis of audio recordings of healthcare profressional delivered sessions and intervention documentation | — |
Countries
England, United Kingdom