Skip to content

Comparison of the disposable reinforced laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the original reusable reinforced LMA

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN35126835
Enrollment
100
Registered
2004-09-30
Start date
2004-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery: Anaesthesia Surgery Anaesthesia

Interventions

1. Disposable reinforced laryngeal mask 2. Original reusable reinforced laryngeal mask airway

Sponsors

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2004 Update - Department of Health (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 100 patients from Anaesthetics

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not provided at time of registration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ease of insertion, chest inflation, intraoperative performance, airway maintenance in recovery, trauma or atraumatic insertion and removal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026