Skip to content

Better Efficacy in Lowering events by General practitioner's Intervention Using remote Monitoring in Heart Failure

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN34357360
Enrollment
500
Registered
2008-01-29
Start date
2007-12-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Systolic heart failure Circulatory System Systolic heart failure

Interventions

BELGIUM-HF Registry: No intervention. Duration of the Registry: 6 months. Follow-up visits will take place at 3 and 6 months. BELGIUM-HF Trial: General practitioner's intervention based on an alarm

Sponsors

Saint-Jean Clinic, Department of Cardiology (Belgium)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: BELGIUM-HF will be conducted in two steps: a prospective registry and a subsequent randomised trial. The BELGIUM-HF Registry will be completed before the BELGIUM-HF Randomised Trial starts. Patients who have been included in the Registry are eligible for the subsequent randomised trial if they meet the inclusion criteria at that time and have signed an informed consent regarding the randomised trial. Inclusion criteria for both BELGIUM-HF Registry and Randomised Trial: 1. Subject with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%, documented by echocardiography, contrast ventriculography or radionuclide angioscintigraphy within 6 months prior to inclusion 2. Subject has been hospitalised within the past 6 months for mild to severe heart failure defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II to IV 3. Subject has received loop diuretics within 2 weeks prior to inclusion 4. Subject is at least 18 years of age 5. Subject or subject's legally representative has signed and dated the study informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subject who is scheduled for corrective valve surgery or coronary revascularisation, i.e. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in a near future 2. Subject who has significant concurrent illness or condition not related to heart failure (i.e. terminal malignancy), associated with a life expectancy that is anticipated to be shorter than the expected duration of the trial 3. Subject on chronic renal dialysis 4. Pregnancy 5. Subject who has a health condition or psychic condition associated with poor compliance, including active alcoholism, mental illness or drug dependence 6. Subject directly involved in the execution of this protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Primary outcome measures in the Randomised Trial: 1. Incidence of HF-related hospitalisations (Duration of follow-up: 6 months) 2. All-cause mortality (Duration of follow-up: 6 months)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following secondary end-points in the Randomised Trial will be assessed at 3 and 6 months except the cost-effectiveness evaluation, which will be carried out after the trial: 1. To demonstrate a reduction in the combined end-point of cardiac death, HF-related hospitalisations and cardiac-related urgent visits and interventions whichever comes first in HF subjects managed with the TeleMonitoring (TM) strategy compared to the Usual Care (UC) strategy 2. To demonstrate a reduction in HF-related hospitalisations in the TM arm compared to the UC arm 3. To demonstrate a reduction in all-cause mortality in the TM arm compared to the UC arm 4. To demonstrate a reduction in cardiac mortality in the TM arm compared to the UC arm 5. To demonstrate a reduction in the number of days spent at the hospital for HF-related conditions in the TM arm compared to the UC arm 6. To determine whether TM intervention improves functional status as assessed by a 6-minute walk test 7. To demonstrate an improvement in quality of life as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) in the TM arm compared to the UC arm 8. To report a shift from "in-patient" to "out-patient" healthcare utilisation in the TM arm compared to the UC arm 9. To conduct a cost-benefit comparison between the two strategies

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026