Skip to content

Effect of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in small airway function in the postoperative period compared with the endotracheal tube (ETT)

Effect of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in small airway function in the postoperative period compared with the endotracheal tube (ETT)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN33426708
Enrollment
80
Registered
2007-09-28
Start date
2007-02-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery: Small airway function Surgery Small airway function

Interventions

Patients will be randomised to either LMA or ET for anaesthesia.

Sponsors

Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. ASA Grades 1 or 2 (ie healthy patients of patients with well controlled chronic conditions) for elective surgery expected to last >30mins, on peripheral or body surfaces. We expect this would mean mainly orthopaedic or plastic surgery patients but could include vascular (varicose veins) 2. Smokers and non-smokers 3. BMI <30 4. Patients consenting to the research 5. No history of gastric reflux

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. ASA 3 or higher 2. BMI >30 3. Patients suffering with gastro-oesophageal reflux 4. Patients unable to consent to the research or those who refuse to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changes in airway resistance in the lung.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
If there are marked differences it will add a new dimension to the choice of airway device used in patients with constrictive/obstructive airways disease.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026