Skip to content

Arm Intervention After Stroke (AIAS): a feasibility study

A randomised, feasibility, safety and efficacy of the ArmeoSpring arm orthosis for acute stroke patients with arm deficits

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN33421390
Enrollment
18
Registered
2009-09-03
Start date
2009-08-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute stroke Circulatory System Stroke, not specified as haemorrhage or infarction

Interventions

The participants will be randomly allocated to one of the three following arms: 1. Standard care: usual therapy, provided by physiotherapists and occupational therapists 2. ArmeoSpring arm orthosis

Sponsors

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age greater than 18 years, either sex 2. Clinical diagnosis of stroke 3. Minimum grade 1 on MRC scale for arm impairment 4. Maximum grade 4 on MRC scale for arm impairment 5. Medically stable 6. Informed consent 7. Ability to understand and follow simple instructions 8. Sitting balance sufficent to use Armeo arm orthosis safely

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Orthosis cannot be fitted to affected limb 2. Bone instability of hemiparetic upper limb (fractures, severe arthritis) 3. Pre-exisiting upper limb deficits 4. Pronounced, fixed contractures of hemiparetic upper limb 5. Open skin lesions on hemiparetic upper limb 6. Major sensory deficit of hemiparetic upper limb 7. Shoulder instability or excessive pain 8. Severe spasticity 9. Severe spontaneous movements e.g. ataxia, dyskinesia 10. Confused or non-cooperative 11. Requiring isolation due to infection 12. Severe visual, perceptual or cognitive problems precluding participation in study protocol 13. Involved in any other intervention study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Feasibility of experimental interventions: 1.1. Number of per protocol interventions recorded at end of intervention period 1.2. Reasons for non-compliance recorded at end of intervention period 2. Acceptability/satisfaction of experimental intervention: informal interviews with participants completed at the end of the intervention period

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Safety outcomes: 1. Arm pain (including shoulder) (measured by 5 point scale none-excruciating) 2. Shoulder subluxation (clinical report) 3. Fatigue (Borg perceived Exertion Scale) 4. All adverse events Safety outcomes will be continously monitored and recorded throughout the study, however will be formally recorded at the end of the intervention period (2 weeks or discharge) (by clinical report and patient scales) and at 3 month report (by patient report and scales, on appropriate measures). Efficacy outcomes: 1. Upper limb function: Action Research Arm Test 2. Upper limb impairment: Fugl-Meyer assessment (upper limb section) 3. Disability: Barthel Index Exploratory outcome: To assist in power calculation to determine the number of subjects required for a phase III randomised controlled trial.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026