Skip to content

Clinical and laboratory assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy in Lao PDR: an open, randomised comparison of artesunate plus mefloquine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (Artekin) for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in the Lao People's Democratic Republic

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN32978789
Enrollment
220
Registered
2005-07-22
Start date
2004-05-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Uncomplicated falciparum malaria Infections and Infestations Malaria

Interventions

1. Oral Artesunate-Mefloquine (AM) 2. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (Artekin)

Sponsors

University of Oxford (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients or their guardians gave fully informed written consent 2. Had a density of asexual P. falciparum of 1000 to 200,000 per microlitre of blood 3. Were aged more than one year 4. Had an axillary temperature of more than 37.5°C or history of fever in the previous three days 5. Were likely to stay in the hospital until parasite clearance and complete the 42-day follow up period

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant or lactating women 2. Patients who took a full course of any antimalarials in the previous three days 3. Patients with signs of severe malaria 4. Those with history of allergy or contraindication to the study drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Parasitological and clinical responses to treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Parasite and fever clearance times 2. Gametocytaemia 3. Changes in haematocrit following antimalarial treatment

Countries

Laos

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026