Skip to content

Is collaborative care more clinically and cost effective than usual care in the management of patients with moderate to severe depression in UK primary care?

Multi-centre randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for depression

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN32829227
Enrollment
550
Registered
2008-11-28
Start date
2008-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression Mental and Behavioural Disorders Depressive episode

Interventions

Intervention group: UK-specific collaborative care protocol developed from our Trial Platform delivered via scheduled telephone and face-to-face contacts by a supervised case manager over four months

Sponsors

University of Exeter (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We will include patients (both males and females) meeting the diagnostic criteria for depression who are aged 18 years and above and who are not currently receiving treatment for depression from specialist mental health services. We will establish the diagnosis of depression by the use of the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R) undertaken by a research worker. We wish our trial to reflect the real world as closely as possible by including all patients with depression; we will therefore include both patients newly identified as depressed, with or without one or more previous depressive episodes, and those with a current depressive illness which has not responded to primary care management in the previous four months. We will also include patients who are suffering from peri- or post-natal depression, with either co-morbid physical illness or co-morbid non-psychotic functional disorders, such as anxiety. In line with the pragmatic nature of this trial, we will reflect usual GP care and participants will be eligible to participate whether they are in receipt of antidepressant medication or not.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients whose risk of suicide is sufficiently acute to demand immediate management by a crisis team. Case managers will be trained to recognise and manage less acute risk through applying the procedures taught in the STORM (Skills-based Training On Risk Management) training, we will follow the trial suicide protocol. We will ensure that the patient's GP is involved immediately so they can take appropriate action for patients with suicidal plans. 2. Psychotic patients 3. Patients where the low mood is better explained by a simple bereavement reaction 4. Patients whose primary presenting problem is alcohol or drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Self-report severity of depression at 4 and 12 months follow-up, assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9). The PHQ9 is a self-report measure and therefore less subject to observer bias. It is sensitive to change with good psychometric properties and we have recently validated its sensitivity and specificity for a UK population.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following outcome measures except CSQ-8 will be taken at baseline, 4 and 12 months follow-up: 1. Diagnosis of depression assessed by Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS-R), a computerised interview, and the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) 2. Health related quality of life, assessed by the SF-36 Health Survey 3. Health care utilisation, measured using case records and a patient service utilisation questionnaire 4. Health state utilities, assessed by EuroQoL 5. Satisfaction with care, measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) at 4 months 6. Economic analysis. The incremental cost per Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY) of the intervention compared to the control will be calculated from NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspectives. Process data will be collected within the trial. The extensive quantitative and qualitative work in our pilot trial has indicated that the planned intervention is effective and acceptable, and our process evaluation in the main trial will focus on: 1. The process of implementation of the intervention, and 2. Mechanisms of change and differential response in patient subgroups Investigation of the process of implementation will involve qualitative interviews with patients, GPs, case managers and specialist professionals, augmented with routinely collected data on from case records and session audio-tapes. Key stakeholders including GPs, patients, case managers and supervisors will be purposively sampled to represent a range and diversity of views and experiences. We will conduct between 30 - 40 interviews with these stakeholders until theoretical saturation has been achieved. All interviews will be audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. The analysis will examine the implementation of collaborative care, with a focus on differences between sites and different case managers. Investigation of mechanisms of change and differential response in patient subgroups will include quantitative measurement of key patien

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026