Skip to content

Early versus later extra physiotherapy compared with usual care to improve arm function after stroke

Early VERsus Later Augmented Physiotherapy compared with usual upper limb physiotherapy: an exploratory randomised controlled trial of arm function after stroke

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN32522341
Enrollment
75
Registered
2018-08-13
Start date
2016-04-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke Nervous System Diseases Cerebrovascular accident

Interventions

Participants will be randomly allocated into 3 groups. The Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit (UKCRC-registered, no. 16) provides a telephone randomisation service for this study. Participants are allocated
moderate: 4 = ARAT = 28
mild: 29 = ARAT = 56) 17. Randomisation takes place after baseline assessments, by telephone to an interactive voice response system to conceal future allocations. A minimisation schedule ensures equ

Sponsors

Glasgow Caledonian University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged at least 18 years 2. Diagnosis of stroke, as confirmed by CT/MRI scans 3. Stoke-related upper limb impairment (score 0-56 on the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)) 4. Capable of undertaking the allocated physiotherapy intervention and adhering to the study protocol, as per judgement of the treating clinician 5. Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study 6. Living within the community services catchment area of a participating study centre

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Any factors likely to interfere with participation in the intervention, including: 1. Medically unstable 2. Severe cognitive/communication impairment (e.g. unable to follow a 2 step command) 3. Severe depression/anxiety 4. Other upper limb impairment: 4.1. Fixed contracture 4.2. Frozen shoulder 4.3. Severe arthritis 4.4. Upper limb pain that inhibits participation 5. Registered blind 6. Terminal cancer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary outcome measures 1-12 will be assessed at the baseline (3 weeks after stroke), 9 weeks, 16 weeks and at the follow-up (24 weeks): 1. Arm activity in free-living conditions, assessed using body worn triaxial accelerometers 2. Self-reported arm activity, assessed using the 14-item Motor Activity Log (MAL 14) 3. Patient-selected goals and goal attainment, assessed using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) 4. Independence in activities of daily living, assessed using the Barthel Index of Activities of Daily Living 5. Motor performance, assessed during the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT): 5.1. Movement duration 5.2. Trunk movement 6. Grip strength, assessed using a Jamar dynamometer 7. Muscle strength, assessed using the arm section of Motricity Index 8. Mood, assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 9. Self-reported impairment, participation and health-related quality of life, assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) 10. Self-reported health-related quality of life, assessed using the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) 11. Carer burden, assessed using Caregiver’s Burden Scale 12. Resource impacts: 12.1. Capital (space and equipment) 12.2. Labour (physiotherapy whole time equivalents, employed in the usual and augmented arm physiotherapy) 12.3. Consumables 12.4. Private costs, assessed using a bespoke participant questionnaire 13. Acceptability, assessed through exit interviews with participants in the intervention groups (augmented arm physiotherapy groups) only at the end of the augmented arm physiotherapy intervention 14. Recruitment, retention and adherence rates, assessed by the number of patients approached, deemed eligible and recruited, the number of dropouts (including withdrawals) and the number of therapy sessions taken, recorded from the first approach about the study by clinical staff through to the follow-up (24 weeks) 15. Safety, assessed from the baseline through to the follow-up (24 weeks): 15.1. Participants will

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026