Skip to content

Helping Others Parent Empathically: an evaluation of Malachi Community Trust's Inspiring Futures parenting programme

The effectiveness of Malachi's Inspiring Futures parenting programme in improving behavioural and emotional outcomes in primary school children with behavioural difficulties: a randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN32083735
Enrollment
280
Registered
2014-10-28
Start date
2014-10-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Emotional and behavioural problems Mental and Behavioural Disorders

Interventions

Date of Trial Registration Application: 20/10/2014 The Inspiring Futures programme comprises two parts, one taking place after the other: (1) a group-based element for parents, and, a

Sponsors

The Big Lottery Fund (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.The child is aged between 7 and 11 years old at point of referral 2.The child attends a mainstream primary school or a children's centre in Birmingham or Somerset (specifically Bridgwater, Taunton or Yeovil) 3.The child scores 14 or above on the Total Difficulties score of the parent-reported SDQ 4.The parent is willing to take part in the programme and the study (information sessions will be held at the schools/children's centres and parents made aware that involvement in the Inspiring Futures programme constitutes involvement in the study) Added 11/12/2014: Malachi accept referrals from school years 2 to 6; therefore, some children will be 6 years old at point of referral.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.The parent has a mental health issue, substance abuse issue, or significant self-esteem and/or confidence issue that would seriously affect their involvement in the therapeutic group to the point that it is deemed impossible to include them 2.The family situation does not allow the parent to fully engage in the process (e.g., they have enough access to their children to impact change). For example, one of the ?homework? tasks in the programme involves the parent spending several minutes of quality time with the child on a daily basis, which would not be possible to implement if the parent only has weekend access to the child 3.The parent does not have a proficient understanding of English, to the level necessary to engage in the group sessions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The study will primarily measure changes in children's behaviour and emotional functioning from the main caregiver's perspective. These measures will be administered/collected at baseline and then at two follow-up points - the first after the parent group part of the programme (or equivalent), and the second after the one-to-one part of the programme (or equivalent). 1. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - parent report (SDQ; Goodman, 1997 (Total difficulties score - this combines ratings of the child's difficulties in four domains of functioning: emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, and peer relationship problems).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Secondary assessments will include an additional measure of child behavioural conduct. In addition, measures will be used to capture changes in parent coping strategies, empathy in parenting and parenting skills, which are the key mediators through which the programme core components are theorised to impact on children's behaviour and emotional wellbeing. These measures will be administered/collected at baseline and then as two follow-up points - the first after the parent group part of the programme (or equivalent), and the second after the one-to-one part of the programme (or equivalent). Supplementary data will also be collected on family demographics (at baseline only). A service use questionnaire will establish other services that the child or family receives during the course of the study (administered at post-test only). 1. Eyberg Child Behaviour Inventory (ECBI; Eyberg, 1978) 2. Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ; Folkman & Lazarus, 1988) 3. Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2; Bavolek & Keene, 2001) Empathy subscale 4. Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ; Frick, 1991) 5. Family Demographics Questionnaire (FDQ; used in Little et al., 2012 and based on the work of Herbert (1993) and previous research on predictors of socio-economic disadvantage (Dumas & Wahler, 1983; Rutter & Quinton, 1977)) 6. Family Service Use Questionnaire (used in Little et al., 2012 and based on the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) (Chisholm et al., 2000; Beecham, 1995))

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026