Skip to content

Randomised trial comparing needle drainage of perianal abscess under local anaesthetic to conventional treatment by incision and drainage under general anaesthetic

Randomised trial comparing needle drainage of perianal abscess under local anaesthetic to conventional treatment by incision and drainage under general anaesthetic

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN31631159
Enrollment
100
Registered
2005-09-30
Start date
2004-02-24
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Signs and Symptoms: Perianal sepsis Signs and Symptoms Perianal sepsis

Interventions

Needle drainage or incision and drainage under general anaesthesia.

Sponsors

Department of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with fluctuant perianal sepsis are recruited on presentation to Accident and Emergency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Diabetic patients 2. Patients under 16 3. Pregnant patients 4. Patients who are immunosuppressed 5. Patients with an obvious perianal fistula 6. Patients in whom other pathology is suspected (e.g. anal cancer)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Failure of aspiration: the number of patients in this group requiring I&D subsequent to aspirations 2. Number of aspirations required Number of patients requiring EUA for fistula Patient acceptability

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026