Skip to content

Imatinib COncentration Monitoring Evaluation: the clinical usefulness of "routine" versus "rescue" therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) interventions in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients

A study to compare the clinical usefulness of "routine" versus "rescue" therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) interventions in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients: a multicentre parallel group open-label randomised clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN31181395
Enrollment
300
Registered
2009-08-18
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) Cancer Myeloid leukaemia

Interventions

Each patient will achieve a one-year study period while being included in one of the two following groups: Intervention arm: A systematic monitoring of imatinib plasma concentrations will be perform

Sponsors

University Hospital Centre and University of Lausanne (CHUV) (Switzerland)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. CML patients in the chronic or accelerated phase of the disease 2. Receiving imatinib since less than 5 years 3. Aged 18 years and older, either sex

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnant and breastfeeding women are excluded de facto from this study 2. Less than 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Percentage of patients remaining without lack of efficacy or disease progression (i.e. "event-free" according to IRSI study definition) 2. Occurrence of moderate or severe adverse events (NCI-CTC grade 2 or more oedema, fatigue, headache, nausea, diarrhoea, musculoskeletal pain and skin rash; grade 3 or more anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and increased liver enzymes; leucopenia and vomiting will not be analysed because of their obvious correlation with neutropenia and nausea) 3. Discontinuation of treatment Measured after one-year follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Percentage of patients achieving major molecular response (MMR) after one-year follow-up 2. Median reduction of BCR-ABL transcripts (i.e. molecular response) over one year 3. Percentage of patients achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) after one-year follow-up 4. Percentage of patients remaining without moderate adverse events of any kind (NCI-CTC grade 2) 5. Percentage of patients with clinical concerns at inclusion (i.e. lack of response/progression or adverse events) and presenting an improvement over one year 6. Percentage of patients with imatinib plasma levels above 1000 ng/ml after one-year follow-up 7. Predictive performance of either total or free concentrations for the achievement of therapeutic outcomes or the occurrence of concentration-related adverse effects (PK-PD relationships using all collected samples) 8. Interaction of genetic factors or co-medication known to affect drug transport (P-gp and hOCT1) and metabolism (CYP3A) with pharmacokinetic variables and efficacy/toxicity outcomes 9. Compliance of practitioners towards dosage adaptation advice

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026