Skip to content

Implantable loop recorder for continuous beat-to-beat monitoring (REVEAL) versus conventional strategy in the analysis of syncope of unknown aetiology

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN29754044
Enrollment
85
Registered
2005-12-19
Start date
2000-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Syncope Signs and Symptoms Syncope and collapse

Interventions

Implantable loop recorders. Conventional strategy includes external loop recording, and (if necessary) repeating of 24 hours holter monitoring, echocardiography or exercise-ECG.

Sponsors

Academic Medical Centre (AMC) (Netherlands)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. No diagnosis after history, physical exam and ECG 2. No diagnosis after echocardiography 3. No diagnosis after 24 hours holter monitoring 4. No diagnosis after exercise-testing 5. Age >18 years, <80 years 6. At least one syncopal episode with trauma or 2 witnessed syncopal episodes 7. Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. (Cardiac) High risk patients 2. Abnormal electrophysiological examination 3. Pace-maker or intra-cardiac defibrillator 4. Pregnancy 5. Not able to activate implantable loop recorder 6. Serious disease with life expectancy <2 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic yield defined as number of patients with arrhythmias with symptoms + number of patients with sinus rhythm with symptoms divided by the total number of patients undergoing the test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Quality of life 2. Cost-analysis

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026