Adhesive restorations for fractured teeth: evaluation of performance of tooth tissue saving restorative techniques

Adhesive restorations replacing cusps in fractured teeth: a comparison of minimal invasive direct and indirect techniques - A randomized clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN29200848

Enrollment

176

Registered

2013-03-12

Start date

2001-12-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth fracture (dental diseases) Oral Health Fracture of tooth

Interventions

Participants are randomly allocated to a direct resin composite cusp-replacing restoration or a indirect resin composite cusp-replacing restoration.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patient (male and female, minimum age for participation in the study was 18 years) with a fracture of one of the cusps of a vital (no root canal treatment present or necessary) premolar.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Premolar with fracture of both cusps 2. Tooth mobility grade III (>1 mm horizontal tooth mobility and vertical tooth mobility)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Difference in long-term survival of direct and indirect resin composite restorations replacing cusps	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Differences between direct and indirect adhesive restorations replacing cusps regarding: 1. Efficacy and (cost) effectiveness 2. Failure mode at restoration level (for instance fracture of restoration) and at tooth level (for instance caries)	—

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026