Skip to content

An investigation of the usability of different adrenaline autoinjector devices

An investigation of the usability of different adrenaline autoinjector devices

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN29175528
Enrollment
200
Registered
2012-03-14
Start date
2012-03-14
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food allergy Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning Anaphylactic shock due to adverse food reaction

Interventions

Randomised controlled assessment - subjects will be randomly allocated to have 1 of 4 different types of training assessment, but will not receive any active intervention apart from the assessment. P

Sponsors

Imperial College London (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Completion of primary and secondary outcome assessments in MAMA trial (http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN12504076/) 2. Willingness to participate in a further assessment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Previous training to use one of the alternative adrenaline autoinjector devices used in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Ability to effectively administer adrenaline using a trainer autoinjector device in a simulated anaphylaxis scenario, assessed by a trained observer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Adverse events during simulated anaphylaxis scenario, assessed by a trained observer.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026