Placement of shoulder replacement for complex upper arm fractures

Anatomic placement of shoulder prosthesis for complex proximal humerus fractures

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN28175069

Enrollment

Registered

2020-04-21

Start date

2016-06-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proximal fracture of humerus Musculoskeletal Diseases

Interventions

The patients were treated with classic method during the period between June 2016 and August 2017. The surgeons involved in this study stopped using this method and switched to our modified method fro

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients treated by shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture during the period between June 2016 and December 2018

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patients can not be followed up.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Overall shoulder function measure using the constant-Murley score at the last follow up appointment	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Shoulder pain measured using Visual Analog scale at follow up appointments 2. ROM of shoulder measured at follow up appointments 3. Radiologic outcomes (anteroposterior, scapular Y, and axillary views, and the status of tuberosities is defined as healing, malunion, migration, and resorption) measured at follow up appointments	—

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026