Skip to content

A comparison of the efficacy and effectiveness of dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artesunate-mefloquine in the treatment of falciparum malaria

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN27914471
Enrollment
640
Registered
2006-04-24
Start date
2003-12-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Falciparum malaria Infections and Infestations Falciparum malaria

Interventions

Comparison of two different treatment regimes: dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and mefloquine-artesunate. Both treatment regimes were given observed or not observed
total of four study groups.

Sponsors

Doctors Without Borders (Medecins sans Frontieres [MSF]) (The Netherlands)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with fever (axillary temperature >37.5°C), or a history of fever within 48 hours 2. Confirmed falciparum malaria (mixed infection P. falciparum with P. vivax and/or P. malariae were included), with more than 500 but less than 100,000 asexual parasites per ml

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Signs of severe and complicated malaria 2. Children below one-year-old 3. Pregnant women 4. Patients with a history of taking mefloquine during the previous two months 5. Patients taken any other antimalarial drugs in the previous 48 hours 6. Patients with a history of psychiatric diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) adjusted parasitological failure rates by day 42

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Vivax appearances 2. Gametocytaemia (person gametocyte weeks between day 0 and 42) 3. Whole blood piperaquine levels at day 7 4. Adverse effects

Countries

Myanmar

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Apr 11, 2026