Skip to content

A comparison of conventional physiotherapy to physiotherapy and behavioural treatment for patients with chronic neck pain

Interactive behavioural modification therapy or a progressive neck exercise programme in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN27611394
Enrollment
56
Registered
2011-03-14
Start date
2008-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic non-specific neck pain Musculoskeletal Diseases Dorsalgia

Interventions

The study will compare the efficacy of a progressive neck exercise programme (PNEP) in isolation to the same intervention in conjunction with interactive behavioural modification therapy (IBMT). The s

Sponsors

Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 16 years and over (no uppper age limit, either sex) 2. Have experienced non-specific neck pain for at least three months 3. Recruited from patients referred to the physiotherapy departments of three hospital physiotherapy departments and one primary care centre in the Greater Manchester region of the United Kingdom. Referrals will be from both primary and secondary care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Unable to speak or write English 2. Identified or suspected radiculopathy, inflammatory disorder, chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis, fibromyalgia or other suspected serious pathology (cervical fracture or dislocation, carcinoma or spinal infection) 3. Diagnosed with serious psychiatric disorder (e.g. bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or dementia)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ): the NPQ is a validated measure of neck pain and disability and consists of nine questions. Participants rate levels of pain and function on five point scales. Scores are then converted to a percentage. The NPQ will be completed prior to commencing treatment and again six months later. The primary measure for the trial will be the between group difference in six month change in NPQ score. The NPQ will be assessed pre and post treatment by means of a self-report postal questionnaire. Primary and secondary outcome measures will be completed before the initial assessment and returned by postal questionnaire. At follow up they will be completed six months after completing the initial questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS): The NPRS is an eleven point pain rating scale whereby participants highlight the number that best represents their current pain intensity. The scale will be anchored 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst possible pain" 2. Pain catastrophising scale (PCS): The PCS is a 13 item questionnaire, recording frequency catastrophic thoughts, with higher scores representing greater levels of catastrophising. Participants rate levels of agreement with 13 statements about levels of catastrophising on five point scales anchored "not at all" and "all the time" 3. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK): Pain-related fear was assessed by the TSK, a seven item questionnaire, with greater scores representing higher levels of pain-related fear. Participants rate levels of agreement with statements relating to pain-related fear on four point scales anchored "strongly agree" and "strongly disagree" 4. Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale - Physical Function Sub Scale (CPSS-pf): The CPSS-pf is one of the sub-scales of the CPSS, a self report measure which assesses participants' confidence in performing physical tasks. Higher scores on the CPSS-pf represent greater confidence in performing physical tasks. Scales were scored from 0 - 8 and anchored 0 = "totally unconfident" and 8 = "totally confident" 5. Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ): Vigilance and awareness to painful sensations was measured by the PVAQ, a 16 item measure, where participants rate levels of agreement with statement regarding pain vigilance and awareness on six point scales. Scales are anchored 0 = "strongly disagree" and 5 = "strongly agree". Higher scores represent greater vigilance and awareness to pain 6. Global Assessment of Change: patients' global assessment of change will be measured by a five point scale assessing improvement in neck pain. The scale will be anchored "much better" and "much worse" 7. Patient satisfaction: patient satisfaction will be measured with a five

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026