Skip to content

Randomised comparison of anticoagulation control and monitoring with versus without laboratory-provided computerized decision support

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN27244875
Enrollment
380
Registered
2005-11-25
Start date
2002-01-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Various Circulatory System Anticoagulation

Interventions

Anticoagulation control and monitoring with versus without laboratory-provided computerized decision support (CDS)

Sponsors

Ontario Program for Optimal Therapeutics (Canada)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Physicians: 1. Family or general practitioner 2. Full-time office practice 3. Practice address within study laboratory catchment area 4. At least 3 eligible patients willing to participate Patients: 1. On long-term warfarin therapy 2. Using the study laboratory for international normalized ratio (INR) tests and expecting to continue to do so for at least 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Acceptability of the CDS service, as assessed by the proportion of physicians who would continue to use it if offered 2. Estimated effectiveness, as assessed by percentage of time within target INR range

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events requiring hospital attendance

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026