Skip to content

Porous vs nonporous enucleation implants: a randomised study

Porous vs nonporous enucleation implants: a randomised study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN27193180
Enrollment
300
Registered
2005-09-30
Start date
2004-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgery: Eye Surgery

Interventions

Randomised, prospective study

Sponsors

Department of Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Approximately 400 patients will be invited to participate, and it is likely that 300 patients will accept. The patients will almost all be aged 20 or more, with the peak age being 60 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Previous treatment 2. Evidence of systematic malignancy 3. Inability to complete written questionnaires measuring quality of life 4. Overseas residence beyond the British Isles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Patient comfort, satisfaction and complications according to type of orbital implant after enucleation for ocular melanoma.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026