Skip to content

The long-term effects of orthodontic growth modification for severe Class II anomalies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN26364810
Enrollment
486
Registered
2001-01-19
Start date
2001-04-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Oral Health Orthodontic growth modification

Interventions

Study 1: Early orthodontic treatment with Twin Block or untreated control Study 2: Orthodontic treatment with a Twin Block or a Herbst appliance Study 3: Orthodontic treatment with a Twin Block applia

Sponsors

University of Manchester (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Studies 1 and 2 : Initial Dental overjet of greater than 7 mm; enrolment in the original Class II study. Study 3: The patient has received Twin Block treatment followed by upper and lower fixed appliances; the original overjet was greater than or equal to 7 mm; any operator in the department provided treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Studies 1 and 2: Initial dental overjet of less than 7 mm; enrolment in the original Class II Study. Study 3: Individuals with clefts of the lip and/or palate or any other suspected identifiable syndromes; people with midline diastema not caused by incisor proclination; people with hypodontia; treatment discontinued early/poor oral hygiene.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Study 1 Children in the early group, already randomised to treatment or control, will be treated where necessary according to the protocol of the consultant. Records will be taken at the end of all treatment or after 5 years if there has been no treatment. The outcomes will be: - Whether further treatment was needed. - If treatment was needed. - Duration of treatment. - Did the treatment involve jaw surgery? - The number of visits required to complete treatment. - Dental change, recorded from study model analysis with the PAR index. - Skeletal and Dental change, measured with cephalometric analysis. - Change in patient perceptions with Piers Harris self-esteem measure. - The cost of the treatment - Trauma to the incisors? Study 2 Patients already randomised to treatment with a Herbst or a Twin Block appliance (treatment now completed) will be followed up for a period of 5 years and the following outcome measures will be collected: - Skeletal and dental change, measured with cephalometric analysis. - Dental change, recorded from study model analysis with the PAR index. - Change in patient perceptions with Piers Harris self-esteem measure. Study 3 Patients finishing growth modification treatment with a Twin Block appliance will be randomised to two groups. One group will be given upper and lower removable retaining appliances, the other will have fixed retaining appliances fitted to the inside of their anterior teeth. Outcomes: - Skeletal and dental change, measured with cephalometric analysis. - Dental change, recorded from study model analysis with the PAR index. - Change in patient perceptions with Piers Harris self-esteem measure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Not provided at time of registration.

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026