Dental caries Oral Health
Conditions
Interventions
The sample consisted of 122 abutments, including incisors, canines, and premolars in 23 participants, which was randomly divided into two groups:
• Group A: Gingival retraction was evaluated in 44 abu
Sponsors
Damascus University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Healthy participants 2. Participants older than 18 years 3. Anterior teeth indicated for full coverage crowns 4. The gingival sulcus depth is 1-2 mm 5. The gingival biotype is thick
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Participants with systemic diseases that impact oral health, including cardiovascular and hematologic disorders, diabetes, and hyperthyroidism 2. Pregnant participants 3. Participants with periodontal diseases 4. Participants are allergic to the materials used 5. Abutments with abnormal size and position
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. The angle of the gingival sulcus opening, which formed between the abutment surface and the inner surface of the gingival sulcus, was measured before (t0) and after (t1) gingival retraction. The difference between the two angles was calculated to determine the horizontal retraction 2. The bleeding was assessed before (t0) and after (t1) gingival retraction according to Weir and Williams study | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| There are no secondary outcome measures | — |
Countries
Syria
Contacts
Public ContactMawia Karkoutly
Outcome results
None listed