Skip to content

Evaluating the effect of automated insulin pumps on pain levels in people with diabetes-related nerve damage

Pain Alleviation In diabetic Neuropathy using hybrid cLosEd Loop inSulin pumpS: the PAINLESS study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN24233750
Enrollment
40
Registered
2026-03-02
Start date
2026-02-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 1 diabetes Nutritional, Metabolic, Endocrine

Interventions

PAINLESS is a two-centre randomized cross-over feasibility study with blinded outcome assessment of patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (defined as pain severity of =4 on an 11-point numerical r

Sponsors

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least 5 years (commenced on insulin treatment within 1 year of diagnosis) 2. Daily neuropathic pain for at least 3 months 3. Distal symmetrical polyneuropathy confirmed by the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score >5 4. 24-hr average pain score >4 (BPI-MSF) 5. HbA1c between 6.5 and 13% 6. On stable neuropathic pain medications for the past 3 months 7. Mean total pain intensity of at least 4 on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; with 0 being ‘no pain’ and 10 ‘worst pain imaginable’) during the last week of the screening period 8. Willing and able to comply with the study schedule and be available for the treatment duration 9. Able to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Non-diabetic neuropathies 2. Other chronic pain disorders are more severe than painful diabetic neuropathy 3. History of major psychiatric disorders 4. Pregnancy/breastfeeding or planning pregnancy during the course of the study 5. Hearing or visual impairment, which would impede the ability to use the technological interventions (as per PI discretion)

Design outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Proportion reaching 30% (moderate) and 50% (substantial) reduction in pain NRS in 7-day average 24-hour pain, as measured by pain diary, from baseline to the last week of each intervention period (week 12) 2. Area under the curve (AUC) for all daily NRS scores, comparing the two different 12-week intervention periods 3. Pain measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (Modified Short Form) – BPI (MSF), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) at baseline screening period and after each 12-week intervention period 4. Physical and emotional functioning measured using EQ-5D-5L, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Type 1 Diabetes-Specific Distress (T1-DDS) at baseline screening and after each 12-week intervention period 5. Average rating of overall improvement measured using the Patient- and Clinician-rated Global Impression of Change (PGIC and CGIC) after each 12-week intervention period 6. Key glycaemic metrics derived from CGM data (Dexcom G7), including time in range (TIR), time above/below range, coefficient of variation (CV), standard deviation (SD), glucose management indicator (GMI), between the 4-week screening period and the final 4 weeks of each 12-week intervention period 7. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measured using capillary electrophoresis method using boronate affinity chromatography at baseline and the end of each 12-week intervention period. 8. The frequency of adverse and serious adverse events as reported by participants during any visit

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactDinesh Selvarajah
d.selvarajah@sheffield.ac.uk+44 (0)114 215 9222

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026