Skip to content

Differences in biting behavior in patients with teeth connected in small bridges and teeth standing free adjacent to a dental implant

Sensory-motoric capacity in patients treated with tooth- and implant-supported restorations

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN24104637
Enrollment
14
Registered
2021-04-01
Start date
2020-12-08
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Single anterior tooth loss in the upper jaw Oral Health Single anterior tooth loss in the upper jaw

Interventions

Patients planned for single implant treatment of central incisors, at present wearing a resin-bonded bridge, were included in the study. The same sensory-motoric bite-test was run twice. Once prior to

Sponsors

Folktandvården Stockholm AB
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Missing a single tooth in position 11 or 21 2. Wearing a resin-bonded bridge planned for single implant treatment 3. Aged =18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Nut allergy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Control of biting behavior measured using a custom-built apparatus (Umeå University, Physiology section, IBM, Umeå, Sweden) invented to measure bite forces during hold-and-split tasks before and after the implant treatment 2. Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) of biting measured using a questionnaire before and after the implant treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Aesthetics evaluated by patients and professionals using questionnaires and a visual analogue rating scale (VAS) and Pink Esthetic Score (PES)/White Esthetic Score (WES) before and after the implant treatment

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026