Skip to content

Injectable valve implantation trial (Invite)

The effectiveness on post-­operative recovery of using ‘off pump’ self­-expanding tissue valves versus ‘on pump’ conventional tissue valves for pulmonary valve replacement: An early phase randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN23538073
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-01-20
Start date
2016-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Children, Cardiovascular disease

Interventions

Eligible patients requiring PVR who give written informed consent to participate, will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio. Randomisation will be carried out using an internet-based system. Group 1:: Parti

Sponsors

University of Bristol
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients undergoing either: 1.1. Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) or 1.2. Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) with PFO closure that would not require CPB if using an injectable valve or 1.3. Pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) with RVOT reconstruction that does not require CPB if using an injectable valve 2. Patients aged 12-­80 years old inclusive, with an adult valve size (25­31mm)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Prisoners and adults lacking capacity to consent 2. Patients aged 12 to 15 years old under the care of social services 3. Patients with pulmonary valve or artery stenosis requiring patch reconstruction of the pulmonary arteries using CPB 4. Patients having an intra-­cardiac shunt that would require CPB despite using an injectable valve 5. Patients having a RVOT reconstruction that would require CPB despite using an injectable valve 6. Patients requiring other anatomical heart corrections that would require CPB despite using an injectable valve 7. Patients who are unwilling to undergo surgery involving a porcine product 8. Patients unable to provide assent/consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Chest drainage in the first 24 post-operative hours.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Post-operative time-to-‘readiness for extubation’. The criteria below will be documented at the time of extubation (when all criteria should be met): normal temperature, cardiovascular system stable, no metabolic imbalance, blood loss decreasing and below a defined rate, able to clear respiratory secretions, patient awake, no residual muscle paralysis and adequate analgesia. 2. Length of ICU stay 3. Inotropic/vasodilator support 4. Chest drain volume in the first 0-12 hours 5. Blood products used in the first 24 hours 6. FFD, defined as all of: normal temperature, pulse and respiration, normal oxygen saturation on air, normal bowel function, physically mobile 7. Cardiac MRI assessment of valve and heart function at 6 months, defined as: presence and degree of pulmonary regurgitation, end-diastolic volume and right ventricular ejection fraction 8. Echocardiography assessment of valve function at routine follow-up at 6 months, defined as presence and degree of pulmonary regurgitation and residual valve stenosis, measured as peak velocity through the valve 9. Health-related quality of life is measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D (or EQ-5D-Y in patients 18 years) and child health questionnaire (CHQ, in patients <18 years) at 6 weeks, 6 months 10. Valve-related complications during follow-up

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactRachel Heys

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 21, 2026