Skip to content

Relaxation of the cervical spondylotic myelopethy histodynamic strain: Protocol for a retrospective cohort study addressing differences between anterior and posterior surgical approach.

Neutralization of a spondylotic cervical myelopathy dynamic compression effect: Impact of two different surgical strategies.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN22078616
Enrollment
60
Registered
2016-01-21
Start date
2008-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy Musculoskeletal Diseases Cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Interventions

This study uses retrospective data from patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy that had been treated with one of two surgical procedures - either expansile cervical laminoplasty or anterior cer
this was used for 3-D reconstruction for detecting tethering of the spinal cord and measurement of subaxial spinal cord length and Pia mater envelope area. All patients are then followed up for 2 yea

Sponsors

University Hospital Centre Zagreb
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Clinical inclusion criteria: CSM classified as Nurick 3-5 in whom left sided C3-C7 open door ECL or ACCF were done for decompression 2. Radiological inclusion criteria were preoperative tethering detected by kMRI 3-D reconstructions. In addition, the patients’ postdecompression spinal cords were untethered, spinal cord shifted backward and the spinal cords dissociated motion from vertebral canal. Spinal cord and brainstem transverse sections obtained from kMRI were used to render 3-D reconstructions of lower part of the brainstem and cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord. Pons to T5/T6 models were used according to the following criteria: 3. Spinal cord tethering: At the point of maximum compression canal compromise is graded 3 (pincer effect); through extension to flexion neck movement the two separate segments of the spinal cord changes the length. Pincer effect divides this two segment. 4. Spinal cord untethering and dissociation of motion: The spinal cord and subarchnoidal space are without compression and therefore graded as 0. The spinal cord homogeneously increases its length from extension to flexion. Preoperative spinal cord 3-D model represents original spinal canal and is compared with postoperative. Dissociation of motion is considered when postoperative 3-D model does not cover pre-opartative, but is shorter and less curly. 5. Backward shift: Preoperative subaxial spinal cord central spline was superposed on the central spline created on the postoperative images. Backward shift is considered when instead of superposing of two lines the postoperative central spline is placed porsterior to the preoperative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with: 1. Kyphosis more than 10 degrees 2. Instability 3. Metabolic or inflammatory bone disease 4. Tumor 5. Multiple sclerosis 6. Anterolateral sclerosis 7. Toxic-metabolic myelopathies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Walking track time, assessed as time needed to pass 30 m with one turn, preoperative, follow-up 2. Walking track steps, assessed as number of steps needed to pass 30 m with one turn preoperative, follow-up 3. Spinal cord length (SCL), assessed as the length of the central spline of the 3-D spinal cord cylinder (SCC) rendered model 4. Pia mater envelope area (PEA), assessed as the envelope area of the 3-D SCC rendered model Measured before surgery and at follow up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Functional disability, measured by the mJOA grade by 2 independent investigators 2. Functional disability, measured by the Nurick scale by 2 independent investigators 3. Backward shift, comparing between preop (before surgery) and follow-up MRIs 4. Subsidence, comparison between preop and follow-up MRIs Measured before surgery and at follow up.

Countries

Croatia

Contacts

Public ContactMarin Stancic
marin@stancic.eu+38512376328

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026