Effectiveness of repeated-sprint training in moderately trained subjects Other
Conditions
Interventions
Participants were familiarized with the Wingate test in week 1. They were tested on Wingate and repeated sprint tests on week 2 (both tests being separated by 48 h). They were randomly balanced in a c
Sponsors
EuroMov Digital Health in Motion
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Regular sport training + being accustomed to intense exercise such as repeated sprints 2. No intolerance to moderate hypoxia 3. No stay at altitudes above 1500 m in the previous 2 months 4. Aged over 18 years and below 30 years
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Does not meet the inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Mean power output measured on an ergocycle during testing sessions, i.e. at baseline, 1 and 2 weeks after training completion | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Heart rate measured by Polar H10 chest sensor during all training and testing sessions 2. Rate of perceived exertion measured with the Borg's scale (6 to 20) after each training and testing session 3. Oxygen pulse saturation measured via an infrared sensor during all training sessions 4. Participants' wellness measured by a questionnaire (Hooper and Mackinnon, 1995) before each testing session 5. Peak power output measured on an ergocycle at baseline, 1 and 2 weeks after training completion 6. Mean power output measured on an ergocycle during all training sessions | — |
Countries
France
Contacts
Public ContactFrançois Favier
Outcome results
None listed