Skip to content

Malignant mesothelioma - can we improve quality of life?

A multicentre non-blinded randomised controlled trial to assess the impact of Regular Early SPEcialist symptom Control Treatment on quality of life in malignant Mesothelioma - 'RESPECT-Meso'

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN18955704
Enrollment
174
Registered
2014-01-31
Start date
2014-03-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2020-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mesothelioma Cancer Mesothelioma, unspecified

Interventions

Regular early Specialist Symptom Control Treatment (SSCT) and Standard Therapy. In the regular early SSCT group, patients will be seen within three weeks of randomisation by the SPC

Sponsors

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Histological or cytological confirmation of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) 2. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-1. (Asymptomatic patients score 0; symptomatic but ambulatory patients score 1) 3. The diagnosis of MPM received within the last 6 weeks 4. Ability to provide written informed consent in English and comply with trial procedures 5. Males and females aged 18 and over

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Current exclusion criteria as of 21/09/2015: 1. Other known malignancy within 5 years (excluding localised squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade III and low grade prostate cancer (Gleason score <5, with no metastases)). 2. Significant morbidity which the lead physician (or MDT) feel will unduly confound or influence QOL. 3. Those patients the MDT judge require referral to the SPCT at the point of diagnosis. 4. Concurrent, or less than 3 months, since participation in another non-mesothelioma clinical trial that may affect QOL. 5. Participation in a concurrent mesothelioma trial, within 12 weeks after randomisation, that may affect QOL. 6. Referral at the time of recruitment for cytoreductive, tumour de-bulking, radical decortication or extrapleural pneumonectomy surgery for MPM. (Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery or ‘mini’ thoracotomy for pleurodesis and diagnosis attempts are permissible.) 7. Chemotherapy treatment for MPM initiated prior to consent. 8. A significant history of depression / anxiety / psychiatric illness requiring specialist hospital care within the last 12 months. Previous exclusion criteria: 1. Other known malignancy within 5 years (excluding localised squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade III and low grade prostate cancer (Gleason score <5, with no metastases). 2. Significant morbidity which the lead physician (or MDT) feel will unduly confound or influence quality of life (QOL). 3. Those patients the MDT judge require referral to the SPCT at the point of diagnosis. 4. Concurrent, or less than 3 months, since participation in another clinical trial that may affect QOL. 5. Referral at the time of recruitment for cytoreductive, tumour de-bulking, radical decortication or extrapleural pneumonectomy surgery for MPM (Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery or ?mini? thoracotomy for pleurodesis and diagnosis attempts are permissible) 6. Chemotherapy treatment for MPM initiated prior to consent. 7. A significant history of depression / anxiety / psychiatric illness requiring specialist hospital care within the last 12 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary objective of this randomised controlled study is to assess the impact of regular early specialist symptom control treatment (SSCT) involvement on global quality of life (QOL) in patients recently diagnosed with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) 12 weeks post randomisation as compared to standard care.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary objectives are to assess the impact of regular early SSCT involvement in the care of patients recently diagnosed with MPM on the following: 1. QOL in patients after 24 weeks 2. Patient mood at 12 and 24 weeks 3. Primary caregiver QOL and mood at 12 and 24 weeks, and 24 weeks after patient death 4. Overall survival between the two study groups 5. Healthcare utilisation and healthcare costs 6. The cost-effectiveness of regular early SSCT when compared to usual practice Added 21/08/2014: 7. Sub-group analysis of HRQoL at 12 and 24 weeks for patients based on the neutrophil, lymphocyte ratio and radiological staging at time of diagnosis

Countries

Australia, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026