Intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus AO type B or C Injury, Occupational Diseases, Poisoning
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Current key inclusion criteria as of 16/03/2026: 1. Aged = 60 years 2. Intra-articular distal humerus fracture (AO type B or C) 3. Suitable for surgical treatment with either EA or ORIF 4. Injury to anticipated day of surgery =28 days Current key inclusion criteria as of 16/08/2025: 1. Aged = 60 years 2. Intra-articular distal humerus fracture (AO type B or C) 3. Suitable for surgical treatment with either EA or ORIF 4. Injury to the anticipated day of surgery =21 days Previous key inclusion criteria: 1. Aged =60 years 2. Intra-articular distal humerus fracture 3. Suitable for surgical treatment with either elbow arthroplasty (EA) or ORIF 4. Injury to the anticipated day of surgery =21 days
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Current key exclusion criteria as of 14/08/2025: 1. Open fracture 2. Metastatic pathological fracture 3. Patient not suitable for surgery 4. Patient unable to adhere to trial protocol/procedures 5. Multiple fractures in the same arm precluding one treatment option 6. Any other injury that, in the opinion of the treating clinician, is likely to significantly alter arm function/ outcomes 7. Previous participation in the FOREST clinical trial Previous key exclusion criteria: 1. Open fracture 2. Pathological fracture 3. Patient not suitable for surgery 4. Patient unable to adhere to trial protocol/procedures 5. Multiple fractures in the same arm precluding one treatment option 6. Any other injury that, in the opinion of the treating clinician, is likely to significantly alter arm function/ outcomes
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Upper limb specific function measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 4 months post-surgery | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Current secondary outcomes as of 16/03/2026: 1. Upper limb specific function measured using the DASH at baseline (for pre-injury function), 6 weeks and 12 months post-surgery and at the 49-month whole study timepoint 2. Upper limb specific function measured using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) at baseline (for pre-surgery function), 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post-surgery 3. Elbow pain measured using the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation form (PREE) pain sub-scale at baseline, 6 weeks, 4- and 12 months post-surgery 4. Health-related quality of life (QoL) measured using the EQ-5D-5L at baseline (for pre-injury QoL and pre-surgery QoL), 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post-surgery 5. Healthcare resource use and comparative cost-effectiveness measured using staff-completed case report forms and a purposely designed patient self-reported questionnaire completed prior to point of discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post-surgery 6. Patient recovery of function measured using discharge destination, days in usual residence, days to return to driving, days absent from paid work and use of health services prior to point of discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post-surgery Previous secondary outcomes: 1. Upper limb specific function measured using the DASH at baseline (for pre-injury function), 6 weeks and 12 months post-surgery and at the 49-month whole study timepoint 2. Upper limb specific function measured using the Oxford Elbow Score (OES) at baseline (for pre-surgery function), 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post-surgery 3. Elbow pain measured using the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation form (PREE) at baseline, 6 weeks, 4 and 12 months post-surgery 4. Health-related quality of life (QoL) measured using the EQ-5D-5L at baseline (for pre-injury QoL and pre-surgery QoL), 6 weeks, and 4- and 12 months post-surgery 5. Healthcare resource use and comparative cost-effectiveness measured using a purposely designed patient self-reported questionnaire completed pr | — |
Countries
England, Northern Ireland, Scotland, United Kingdom, Wales