Skip to content

Tuning fork testing on ankle injuries

The tuning fork test: an accurate and efficient method of improving the diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rules

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN18630663
Enrollment
1300
Registered
2010-05-21
Start date
2009-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Musculoskeletal

Interventions

The tuning fork test consists of activating a 128Hz Gardner Brown tuning fork by holding the tuning fork by the stem and tapping the weighted tines on the fleshy side of the palm. The vibrating tuning

Sponsors

Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Ability to walk before the injury 2. Minimum age 12 years - no upper age limit, either sex 3. Injury to ankle by simple twisting mechanism - inversion/eversion 4. Identified as Ottawa positive - that is bony tenderness to lateral and/or medial malleolus

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Inability to give own informed consent 2. Patients who have a history of peripheral neuropathy from any cause 3. Patients who are pregnant will only be included if the risk of x-ray is considered to be less than the risk to the foetus from exposure to x-ray 4. Patients who are unable to walk prior to the incident will not be included as the OARs are designed to be used in patients who can walk before the incident

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa ankle rules is increased when used in conjunction with the tuning fork test. The tuning fork test and ankle x-rays are interpreted blind and then compared. The number of true and false negatives and positives is compared and will be displayed and analysed in a 2 x 2 table. When collecting the data the research nurse is a ware of the results of both tests but the results will not be analysed until the sample size is met (n = 1300).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Demographics of the patient (i.e., gender, age, ethnicity) 2. Operator experience

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026