Skip to content

Is laser treatment effective for patients with periodontal disease?

Efficacy of Er:YAG laser on chronic periodontitis as an adjunctive non-surgical treatment: a split-mouth randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN18400416
Enrollment
27
Registered
2018-07-11
Start date
2015-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2019-09-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate or severe chronic periodontitis Digestive System Periodontal disease (periodontitis)

Interventions

Using a split-mouth design, two quadrants (one quadrant from each jaw) were randomly allocated to either the test or control group. The quadrants in the test group received Er:YAG laser (ERL) plus sca

Sponsors

Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged 35-70 years 2. Minimum of 16 teeth (4 per quadrant) 3. At least one site with probing depths (PD) =4 mm in each quadrant, with bleeding on probing 4. Good general health 5. Non-smoker

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Possible participants were excluded if they 1) had received periodontal treatment within the previous 6 months; 2) had received systemic antibiotic therapy within the previous 6 months; 3) had suffered systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of therapy, such as diabetes mellitus or blood disease; 4) were pregnant; or 5) were smokers. 1. Received periodontal treatment within the previous 6 months 2. Received systemic antibiotic therapy within the previous 6 months 3. Suffered systemic diseases that could influence therapy outcome (e.g. diabetes mellitus, blood disease) 4. Pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Periodontal probing was used to measure the following at the baseline, after 3 months and after 6 months: 1. Probing depth (PD) 2. Clinical attachment level (CAL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The following were measured at the baseline, after 3 months and after 6 months: 1. Bleeding index (BI) assessed through periodontal probing 2. Plaque index (PLI) assessed by an examiner using a scale of 0 to 3 with the following definitions: - 0: No plaque - 1: Cannot see plaque but plaque can be detected with probe - 2: Moderate plaque can be seen - 3: Lots of plaque can be seen

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026