Skip to content

Clinical usability evaluation of an adaptive templates fitting system for socket design

An evaluation of clinical usability-related safety of an adaptive templates fitting system to support prosthetics socket design

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN18314147
Enrollment
46
Registered
2025-06-04
Start date
2025-01-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prosthetic socket design Other

Interventions

Group A – Prosthetists Prosthetists participating in Stage One (the iterative usability testing phase) are first informed about the study via their clinic lead and invited to participate. If intereste

Sponsors

Radii Devices Ltd
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All
Age
18 Years to 110 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Group A: Prosthetists: 1. Prosthetists working with patients recruited as participants in the study 2. Are willing to design a socket using the ATFS Group B – Adults with limb loss: 1. Over the age of 18 years 2. Have had a transtibial amputation 3. Deemed ready to cast for a new prosthesis by the clinical team as per usual care at the prosthetic centre 4. Able to understand verbal and written English and give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Group A: Prosthetists 1. Not familiar with using CAD software technologies for socket design 2. Unwilling to design a socket using the ATFS Group B – Adults with limb loss: 1. Contraindication to be fitted for a prosthetic socket 2. Unwilling for their prosthetist to design their socket using the ATFS 3. Unable to answer verbal questions (as per normal fitting appointment) on their socket fitting and comfort

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Usability of the ATFS is measured using a semi-structured interview with the prosthetist at post-definitive socket delivery (per patient case) 2. Prosthetist confidence and experience with the ATFS is measured using a semi-structured interview conducted by the study researcher at post-definitive socket delivery 3. Perceived usability and clarity of ATFS training materials is measured using a semi-structured interview conducted by the study researcher at post-definitive socket delivery 4. Socket comfort is measured using the Socket Comfort Score (SCS) at the definitive socket fitting appointment

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Time taken for initial rectification and socket design using the ATFS is measured using direct observation and meeting recording at the assessment appointment in Stage One 2. Time taken for initial rectification and socket design using the ATFS is measured using system log data at the assessment appointment in Stage Two 3. Prosthetist-reported typical design time using standard CAD/CAM software is measured using self-report at the assessment appointment

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactJoshua Steer
rosalynne@radiidevices.com+44 7766708201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026