Skip to content

Catheter versus thoracoscopic surgical ablation in long standing persistent atrial fibrillation

CAtheter versus thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation in long standing persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN18250790
Enrollment
120
Registered
2015-04-24
Start date
2015-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmia Circulatory System Cardiac arrhythmia, unspecified

Interventions

The study will compare outcomes in two groups of patients: one group will undergo catheter and the other surgical ablation of areas giving rise to atrial fibrillation. 1. Thoracoscopic Surgical AF Ab

Sponsors

Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age = 18 years 2. LSPAF (> 12 months’ duration) 3. EHRA > 2 4. Left ventricular ejection fraction = 40% 5. Suitable for either ablation procedure (added 05/05/2016)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria as of 05/05/2016: 1. Valvular heart disease with severity greater than mild 2. Contraindication to anticoagulation 3. Thrombus in the left atrium despite anticoagulation in therapeutic range 4. Cerebrovascular accident within the previous 6 months 5. Previous thoracic or cardiac surgery (including surgical interventions for AF) 6. Prior left atrial catheter ablation for AF 7. Unable to provide informed written consent 8. Active malignancy, another severe concomitant condition or presence of implanted intracardiac devices that would preclude patient undergoing study specific procedures 9. Pregnant or breast-feeding, or women of childbearing age not using a reliable contraceptive method Previous exclusion criteria: 1. Significant valvular heart disease 2. Contraindication to anticoagulation 3. Thrombus in the left atrium despite anticoagulation 4. Cerebrovascular accident within the previous 6 months 5. Significant previous thoracic or cardiac surgery (including surgical interventions for AF) 6. Prior left atrial catheter ablation for AF 7. Unable to provide informed written consent 8. Active malignancy or another severe concomitant condition that would preclude patient undergoing study specific procedures 9. Pregnant or breastfeeding, or women of childbearing age not using a reliable contraceptive method

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary efficacy end-point is freedom from atrial arrhythmias after a single procedure without AADs at 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Previous secondary outcome measures: 1. Intervention-related major complication rate defined as permanent injury or death, that requires intervention for treatment, or prolongs or requires hospitalization for more than 48 hours 2. Clinical success, defined as a 75% or greater reduction of AF burden assessed by implantable loop recorder at 12 months with or without AADs. 3. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia, after multiple procedures without AADs at 12 months 4. Atrial anatomy and function following ablation as assessed by echocardiography and CMR 5. Change in AF symptom score (EHRA score) and quality of life assessments (EQ5D, AFEQT) 6. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) accrued during the 12-month study period 7.Cost-effectiveness (Incremental Cost per QALY gained) for surgical ablation compared with CA estimated over the 12-month study period (‘within trial’ analysis) and over a lifetime horizon (estimated by modeling) Current secondary outcome measures as of 22/03/2017: 1. Intervention-related major complication rate defined as permanent injury or death, requires unplanned intervention for treatment, or prolongs or requires unplanned hospitalization for more than 48 hours 2. Clinical success, defined as a 75% or greater reduction of AF burden assessed by implantable loop recorder at 12 months with or without AADs. 3. Freedom from atrial arrhythmia, after multiple procedures without AADs at 12 months 4. Atrial anatomy and function following ablation as assessed by echocardiography and CMR 5. Change in AF symptom score (EHRA score) and quality of life assessments (EQ5D, AFEQT) 6. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) accrued during the 12-month study period 7.Cost-effectiveness (Incremental Cost per QALY gained) for surgical ablation compared with CA estimated over the 12-month study period (‘within trial’ analysis) and over a lifetime horizon (estimated by modeling)

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026