Mental health Mental and Behavioural Disorders
Conditions
Interventions
There are no interventions in this study and it is not an observational study. This is an evaluative case study.
This study triangulates publicly available documents about the respons
Sponsors
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The study interview sample is individuals who can cast light on the decisions taken about Grenfell, what determined those decisions, how they were arrived at, what mechanisms were available - particularly for joint working across agencies - and what the impact was. Recruitment is not open to the public. Recruitment will be from four main sources: 1. From the NHS, clinicians, managers and commissioners involved decision making and delivery 2. From the local authority and the schools for which they have a coordinating role, managers, commissioners and headteachers 3. From the voluntary sector those involved in delivering services to those affected by Grenfell, particularly those who received funding of other support from the local authority or the NHS 4. From the local community, opinion leaders who are able to comment on the overall health and wellbeing programme
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Those who were not involved with, or in a position to observe, the Grenfell health and wellbeing response over the period covered by the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The response of statutory organisations to the Grenfell Fire, assessed using: 1. Publicly available documents from [August 2017 – June 2019] 2. Routinely reported quantitative data on outputs and costs from [August 2017 – June 2019] 3. Interviews with those who took key decisions or who were in a position to observe and comment on those decisions from [August 2017 – June 2019] | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| There are no secondary outcome measures | — |
Countries
England, United Kingdom
Outcome results
None listed