Skip to content

Determining trustworthiness and safety of remote consulting during the COVID-19 pandemic in primary healthcare for chronic disease populations in Nigeria and Tanzania

COVID-19: Determining trustworthiness and safety of REmote Consulting in primary Healthcare for chronic disease populations in Nigeria and Tanzania using a stepped wedge design - The REaCH Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN17941313
Enrollment
8000
Registered
2021-01-20
Start date
2021-03-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary heart disease Not Applicable

Interventions

Current intervention as of 12/06/2023: The intervention involves REaCH training for healthcare workers to deliver remote consulting via mobile phone to patients and will be compared to care as usual.
Tier 2 trainees are other cadres e.g. community health workers, pharmacy assistants, and medical assistants who may communicate in English or in local languages. The tier 1 and tier 2 trainees work as

Sponsors

King's College London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Receiving healthcare from participating primary care facilities 2. Able to speak, read and write in English or local language 3. Give consent to participate in the study 4. Aged =18 years 5. Receiving treatment and/or monitoring for =1 of the following conditions: 5.1. Type 2 diabetes 5.2. Hypertension 5.3. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 5.4. Coronary heart disease 6. Contact with health facility =3 times per year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. No access to a mobile phone or fixed phone in the community 2. Identified by health workers as nearing the end of life or currently severely ill 3. Carers consulting on another person’s behalf 4. Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Patient trust in healthcare provider measured using the Physician Humanistic Behaviour Questionnaire (PHBQ) at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 months 2. Face to face consultation rate defined as the number of visits per month for the eligible patient population where the patient is seen in person by the consulting health worker measured from the open cohort data at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 months 3. Remote consultation rate defined as the number of visits per month for the eligible patient population conducted using a telephone measured from the open cohort data at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 months 4. Prescribing rate defined as the number of prescriptions issued and collected to the eligible patient population per month. This outcome is a proxy for patient safety as a change in this outcome is an indicator of changes in safety and confidence measured from the open cohort data at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Patient engagement with their health measured using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 months 2. Patient safety assessed from the number of investigations processed by the facility monthly, matched to the patient’s consultation type (where an increase may indicate a higher safety threshold when the person cannot be examined, and a decrease may indicate missed health needs) measured from the open cohort data at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12 months

Countries

Nigeria, Tanzania

Contacts

Public ContactRebecca Rogers
rebecca.e.rogers@kcl.ac.uk+44 (0)20 7848 3620

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026