Dental pain and anxiety Oral Health
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Children aged 6–9 years. 2. Classified as "definitely positive" or "positive" on Frankel’s behavior rating scale. 3. Requiring pulpotomy treatment in mandibular primary molars.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Children with oral, mental, and/or systemic conditions that could affect treatment outcomes. 2. Children who had taken sedative or analgesic medications within the 24 hours preceding the dental examination.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Pulse rate was objectively measured as an indicator of dental anxiety using a finger pulse oximeter (Alpha, Prolinx GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany). Measurements were recorded at six critical time points: Baseline (t0). Following patient conditioning before treatment initiation (t1). Immediately after IANB administration (t2). Post rubber dam placement (t3). Following pulp amputation (t4). Upon treatment completion (t5) 2. The Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale (FLACC) behavioral pain scale, a nonverbal pain assessment tool, was recorded at three critical time points: Immediately after IANB administration (t2). Post rubber dam placement (t3). Following pulp amputation (t4) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Subjective anxiety levels were assessed using a 5-point pictorial scale (Facial Image (FI) Scale) with facial expressions ranging from very happy (score = 1) to very fearful (score = 5). The children were asked to choose the face that best matched their emotional state at three-time points: Baseline (t0), immediately after IANB administration (t2), and following pulp amputation (t4) | — |
Countries
Syria