Skip to content

Evaluating the effects of two different lip lift techniques on the relapse and nasal facial proportions

Comparison between the modified bullhorn lip lift and the endonasal technique on the nasal facial proportions and relapse: a randomized clinical trial (RCT)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN17452386
Enrollment
12
Registered
2025-03-21
Start date
2022-05-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enhancing the cosmetic proportions of the upper lip skin, vermillion, and teeth show during rest by reducing the upper lip skin length. Oral Health

Interventions

Performing upper lip lift surgery using one of the two techniques: Modified Upper Lip Lift Technique described by Talei, et al, and Endonasal Lip Lift Technique Described by Raphael, et al. The study

Sponsors

Damascus University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients aged 18 years or older. 2. No prior lip augmentation procedures. 3. Nasolabial height to vermilion height ration grater than 3, classiftying them as lip type 2 or 3 according to Raphael and Harris. 4. No congenital syndromes or systemic diseases that could affect wound healing. 5. No bleeding disorders or anticoagulants. 6. No planned facial surgical interventions during the study period. 7. Commitment to regular follow ups.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Chronic diseases and infections. 2. Bleeding disorders or on anticoagulants. 3. Undergoing immunosuppressive therapy. 4. Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. 5. Severe gummy smile. 6. History of lip augmentation procedure. 7. Patients scheduled for orthognathic surgery. 8. Lip type 1 according to Raphael and Harris (2014). 9. Pregnant, or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Skin Relapse in millimeters measured using a caliper at preoperative (T0), 6 months post surgery (T1)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Preoperative (T0), 6 months post surgery (T1): 1. Upper lip relationship with the E-Line 2. Nasal tip changes according to Powel 3. Nasal width (mm) 4. Nostrils width (mm) 5. Nasolabial angle 6. Upper lip projection 7. Patient satisfaction using PSQ questionnaire 8. Scar assessment using POSAS method Direct measurements are taken using a caliper, while photographic measurements are analyzed using ImageJ software

Countries

Syria

Contacts

Public ContactSuliman Zayoud
sleiman.zayoud@gmail.com+963 992888999

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026