Skip to content

Study on non-urgent emergency department visits in South Tyrol (Italy)

The Care Accessibility and Reasons for Non-urgent Emergency Department Visits in South Tyrol (Italy): The multicenter cross-sectional CARES study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN17355506
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2024-09-25
Start date
2024-09-09
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult patients accessing emergency department for non-urgent visits. Other

Interventions

The enrolled participants will be asked to complete a paper questionnaire designed to collect information on their symptoms, self-perceived urgency, and motives for attending the ED. At the same time,

Sponsors

Institute of General Practice and Public Health (University Center for Healthcare Professions)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Adult patients (= 18 years). 2. Clinical conditions triaged as "non-urgent" ("blue") or "normal" ("green") according to the Manchester Triage System. 3. Able to communicate in either German or Italian. 4. Consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Minor patients (<18 years old). 2. Patients with high acuity triaged as "immediate" ("red"), "very urgent" ("orange"), or "urgent" ("yellow"). 3. Non-triaged patients requiring immediate or emergency treatment without waiting time. 4. Patients triaged with fast track (i.e., specialized visits). 5. Additionally, patients meeting one or more of the following criteria will also be excluded: 5.1. Cognitive impairment (e.g., patients with any condition that results in impaired decision-making that may affect informed consent, such as patients with dementia or psychiatric conditions). 5.2. Inability to communicate verbally in German or Italian. 5.3. Lack of consent (e.g., patients who refused to participate or were unable to consent). 5.4. Direct referral to another outpatient clinic or department within the hospital.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Potentially avoidable ED visits. There is no universally accepted definition of a potentially preventable ED visit. In our study we define potentially avoidable ED visits those that are (1) triaged as non-urgent (i.e., priority level "blue" or "green" according to the MTS), and (2) where the care provided could have been treated safely and effectively in a primary care setting (e.g., GP). Accordingly, the healthcare professionals in the ED (i.e., the triage nurse and the medical doctor in charge of the patient) will independently assess the patient at discharge if the visit was potentially avoidable (1=yes, 2=no) considering the patient’s somatic, mental, or social problems in accessing the ED. Measured using patient records at the end of the study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients’ self-reported access to primary care services (i.e., contact with or visit to the GP) for the current health problem prior to attending the ED (1=yes, 2=no). Measured using patient records at the end of the study.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Public ContactDietmar Ausserhofer
dietmar.ausserhofer@claudiana.bz.it+39 471 067 290

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026