Skip to content

Impact of abemaciclib on patients' roles and responsibilities

Impact of abemaciclib on patients' roles and responsibilities: a multi-centre observational quality of life study with nested qualitative interview study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN17281696
Enrollment
150
Registered
2020-06-16
Start date
2020-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Quality of life of women receiving abemaciclib for breast cancer Cancer Malignant neoplasm of breast

Interventions

This is a quality of life observational study. Participants will complete validated quality of life measures at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months and a weekly diarrhoea management diary. A subset of the par

Sponsors

University of Sussex
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female
Age
18 Years to 100 Years

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who are prescribed either: 1.1. Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant (for women who have relapsed after endocrine therapy), or 1.2. Abemaciclib in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (for women who have not previously been treated) 2. Patients who are able to give fully informed consent and are able to read and speak in English 3. Patients who are 18 years old and over

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with cancers other than breast or receiving treatments other than abemaciclib 2. Patients who are not able to provide fully informed consent or who are not able to read and speak English 3. Patients under 18 years of age 4. Patients who are currently inpatients or who are too distressed to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Quality of life assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment general scale (FACT-G) with diarrhoea (DS) and endocrine symptom (ES) subscale at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months 2. Role function assessed using the Patient Roles and Responsibilities Scale (PRRS) at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Qualitative evidence of patients’ experience of treatment collected via a semi-structured interview at 3 months 2. Treatment-related diarrhoea measured using the Diarrhoea Management Diary (DMD) completed weekly for 6 months 3. Strategies employed to counter diarrhoea, including non-adherence to treatment, measured using the DMD completed weekly for 6 months

Countries

England, Scotland, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactHelena Harder
impactor@sussex.ac.uk+44 (0)1273 873019

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026