Patient satisfaction of friction-grip dental implant supported teeth and simple method of removal

Patient satisfaction of "Locked-in" Atlantis Conus Abutment supported bridges and a simple method of removal

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ISRCTN

Registry ID

ISRCTN17174308

Enrollment

Registered

2017-09-13

Start date

2017-11-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2017-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Restorative implant dentistry. The use of Conus abutment supported bridges Oral Health Restorative implant dentistry. The use of Conus abutment supported bridges

Interventions

10 patients, fitted with a full arch Atlantis Conus abutment supported bridges, and who have demonstrated "lock-in" are included in this study. Participants are followed up at one, three and six mon

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Any patient of any age fitted with a full arch Conus abutment supported bridge which has exhibited "Lock-in".

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: There is no participant exclusion criteria.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1. Efficacy of the method (does the bridge easily dislodge when the method is used) is meaured using patient questionnaires at one, three and six months 2. Ease of use of the method is measured using a patient questionnaire at one, three and six months 3. How reliably does the prosthesis relic when re-fitted is measured using a patient questionnaire at one, three and six months	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Peri-impant health is measured using a standard BPE probe at one, three and six months.	—

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026