Health implications of reused seasonal chocolate figures Not Specified
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Survey: 1. Health-care professionals (i.e., doctors, nurses) 2. Patients from the two participating institutions Radiological measurement: 3. Easter chocolate figurines of different size and shape from various German manufacturers, purchased between April 01 and May 31 2020, and Christmas chocolate figurines of different size and shape from various German manufacturers, to be purchased from their first availability in stores and supermarkets (presumably early September 2020).
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Does not meet inclusion criteria
Design outcomes
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. Maximal length, breadth and depth the minimum, the mean and maximum thickness of the chocolate mantle, as well the minimum, mean, and maximum thickness of the figurine’s bottom or stand measured (mm) radiologically at a single timepoint 2. Radiation exposure (e.g. volume CT dose index, dose-length-product), scanning time, and time from arrival in the CT suite until the availability of morphologic measures at a single timepoint 3. Health-care professionals’ and patients’ belief in the urban myth that left-over chocolate Easter figurines are rewrapped and sold as Santas, and their willingness to consume chocolate Santas, given CT precluded they had been reused, measured by Likert-scales at a single timepoint 4. Consumption of expired chocolate and symptoms of food-poisoning thereafter measured using a novel questionnaire at a single timepoint | — |
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Contour-Rating Scale (CRS), as assessed by two independent radiologists | — |
Countries
Germany