Skip to content

EPI-SURE: Comparing molecular and imaging techniques for the detection of womb cancer in women with abnormal bleeding

EPI-SURE: A comparative study of epigenetic analysis and ultrasonography for endometrial cancer detection in women presenting with abnormal vaginal bleeding

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16815568
Enrollment
300
Registered
2022-05-31
Start date
2022-06-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2023-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial cancer Cancer

Interventions

The study intervention is a regular ThinPrep® cell sample of the cervix using a Cervex-Brush® (Rovers Medical Devices) taken by the clinician prior to the ultrasound scan. A standard Cusco speculum wi

Sponsors

University College London
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Women aged 45 years or above 2. Abnormal vaginal bleeding warranting an ultrasound examination 3. Women receiving hormonal contraception, hormone replacement therapy, or other hormonal medications, such as Tamoxifen

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Women aged below 45 years 2. Pregnancy 3. Previous hysterectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The 'real world' performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) of the WID™-qEC test in comparison with transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) as a first-line triage for a cohort of women =45 years who present to a tertiary referral centre with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Receiver operating characteristic curves, areas under the curve, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be generated for both TVUS triage (according to an endometrial thickness [ET] cut off of =4.5 mm) and the WID™-qEC test. Sensitivity and specificity including 95% confidence intervals will be calculated, as well as the relevant positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). The ultrasound assessment as well as the Pipelle biopsy and WID™-qEC sample collection will be performed when the patient initially presents to the hospital. If hysteroscopy/endometrial biopsy and/or a hysterectomy is required, this will usually be carried out 1-4 weeks after the initial assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. To assess the number of procedures required in WID™-qEC true-positive and false-negative patients to reach a histological diagnosis, measured using ultrasound +/- Pipelle biopsy at initial presentation, and hysteroscopy/endometrial biopsy and/or hysterectomy 1-4 weeks later, respectively. 2. Stage, histology and grade of disease at diagnosis and relation to WID™-qEC and TVUS findings, measured using surgical staging of the hysterectomy specimen after a hysterectomy has been performed. 3. Rates of inconclusive results, measured using the number of diagnostic procedures carried out (ultrasound, Pipelle biopsy, hysteroscopy/endometrial biopsy, hysterectomy) throughout the patient’s journey to assess the cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding. 4. Performance of the WID™-qCIN test – a test for detecting cervical cancer measured using colposcopy and cervical biopsies at the initial presentation or once referred for colposcopy assessment.

Countries

England, United Kingdom

Contacts

Public ContactDan Reisel
d.reisel@ucl.ac.uk+44 (0)203 108 2001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026