Skip to content

ENact-PD: EEG Neuro-feedback to improve motor function in Parkinson’s

A feasibility trial of the effects of home-based alpha frequency neurofeedback in modulating cortical activity and alleviating motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16783092
Enrollment
9
Registered
2017-08-29
Start date
2018-02-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-02-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson's Disease Nervous System Diseases Parkinson's Disease

Interventions

Current intervention as of 04/08/2023: We will employ a fully within-subjects design. Each participant will receive six home visits from a researcher, with each visit separated by a minimum of 48 hour
Wang, Lees & Brown, 1999). We will measure their speed and accuracy at producing the contractions, and we will record cortical activity vi

Sponsors

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Idiopathic PD diagnosed using the UK Brain Bank Diagnostic Criteria 2. Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-3 (Hoehn and Yahr, 1967; Bhidayasiri and Tarsy, 2012) 3. On stable treatment for the last one month and no planned changes over the period of the study 4. Ability to give informed consent 5. Aged 18 years and over

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Clinical diagnosis of dementia 2. Active psychosis, clinically significant depression or behavioural disturbance 3. Presence of another neurological condition 4. Active adjustment of medication during the predicted study period 5. Inability to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Current primary outcome measure as of 04/08/2023: Cortical activity is measured using an EEG at each session (session 1 pre-test “on” medication; session 2 pre-test “off” medication; sessions 3, 4 and 5 neurofeedback training “off” medication, and session 6 post-test “off” medication). The EEG will involve 4 active electrodes (Brainquiry) mounted in a nylon cap and placed at C3, Cz, C4 and Fz sites in accordance with the international 10-20 electrode system. _____ Previous primary outcome measures: 1. Cortical activity is measured using an EEG at each session (session 1 pre-test “on” medication; session 2 pre-test “off” medication; sessions 3, 4 and 5 neurofeedback training “off” medication, and session 6 post-test “off” medication). The EEG will involve 4 active electrodes (Brainquiry) mounted in a nylon cap and placed at C3, Cz, C4 and Fz sites in accordance with the international 10-20 electrode system 2. Grip force accuracy during each squeeze will be measured continuously using strain gauges mounted in a handgrip dynamometer, interfaced with a data acquisition system (Power 1401) and laptop running Spike2 software at sessions 1, 2 and 6 3. Motor ability will be measured using the newer MDS-UPDRS Parkinson’s motor score and motor quality of life section at sessions 1, 2 and 6 4. Movement onset delay and velocity will be measured using pre- and post-intervention using a simple reaching task at sessions 1, 2 and 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Current secondary outcome measures as of 04/08/2023: 1. Grip force accuracy and the time taken to initiate movement will be recorded during each squeeze will be measured continuously using strain gauges mounted in a handgrip dynamometer, interfaced with a data acquisition system 2. Observed-rated symptomology. This will be assessed during the test phase via scores on the MDS-UPDRS (Goetz et al., 2008) Part III Motor Examination. 3. Self-reported symptomology. This will be assessed during the test phase via scores on the MDS-UPDRS (Goetz et al., 2008) Part II Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (MEDL) questionnaire, on the Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQ-8) (Jenkinson et al. 1997). 4. Participant acceptability will be measured via a short interview about the participants’ subjective experience of home-based neurofeedback training _____ Previous secondary outcome measure: Participant acceptability will be measured using a simple short questionnaire asking about the participants’ subjective experience of the procedure at session 6.

Countries

United Kingdom, Wales

Contacts

Public ContactJohn Hindle

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026