Skip to content

AceFIT – a study comparing three methods of treatment of acetabular fractures (a type of hip fracture) in older patients; surgical fixation versus surgical fixation and hip replacement versus non-surgical treatment

AceFIT – Acetabular Fractures in older patients Intervention Trial: a feasibility study comparing three methods of treatment of acetabular fractures in older patients, surgical fixation versus surgical fixation and hip replacement versus non-surgical treatment

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16739011
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-11-28
Start date
2017-11-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Trauma Musculoskeletal Diseases Musculoskeletal Trauma

Interventions

Patients who have sustained an acetabular fracture, fulfil the eligibility criteria and consent to be enrolled on the study are placed at random into one of three groups each with 20 participants. One

Sponsors

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Male or female aged 60 years or over, including those with cognitive impairment 2. Displaced acetabular fracture where the treating surgeon considers it to be sufficiently displaced to consider surgery (fractures including displacement of anterior column, posterior column or quadrilateral plate, posterior wall with marginal impaction) 3. Informed consent to participate has been obtained from the patient, or agreement from a personal or nominated consultee (in the case of patient who are lacking capacity to consent)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Open fractures 2. Contra-indication to anaesthesia 3. Patient has a total/partial hip replacement in situ (same side as acetabular fracture ) 4. Pre-injury the patient was immobile (i.e. confined to a bed or chair) 5. Polytrauma (patient has significant other injuries likely to have an impact on rehabilitation e.g. bilateral wrist fractures or proximal humerus fracture)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Health related quality of life is measured using EQ-5D-5L at six months post randomisation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Function and pain with patients is measured using the Oxford Hip Score at nine months 2. Disability is measured using Disability Rating Index at nine months 3. Surgical outcomes are measured using radiographic evaluations at nine months 4. Perioperative physiological variables 5. Ability to walk 6. Qualitative outcome 7. Adverse Events of special interest All measured at 9 months

Countries

England, United Kingdom, Wales

Contacts

Public ContactAndrew ;Daniel Carrothers;Alvarez-Berdugo

;

andrew.carrothers@addenbrookes.nhs.uk;danielalvarez-berdugo@addenbrookes.nhs.uk+44 (0)1223 257093;+44 (0)1223 254684

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026