Skip to content

Comparison of the cryopreservation method for day 3 embryos using slow freezing or vitrification

Randomised controlled trial comparing the implantation potential of a frozen-thawed cleavage-stage embryo cryopreserved using vitrification or slow freezing

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16672665
Enrollment
306
Registered
2009-01-30
Start date
2008-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-01-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

In vitro fertilisation Pregnancy and Childbirth Fertilisation methods

Interventions

IVF patients will receive a frozen-thawed embryo that was frozen using the vitrification method or the standard slow freezing method.

Sponsors

Research Foundation Flanders (Belgium)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Female aged less than 38 years 2. Patients with day 3 single or double embryo transfer and surplus embryos frozen 3. Cryopreservation criteria: 3.1. 6 - 7 cell embryos on day 3 with less than or equal to 20% fragmentation 3.2. Greater than or equal to 8 cell embryos on day 3 with less than or equal to 50% fragmentation 3.3. No multi-nucleated embryos

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with preimplantation genetic diagnosis treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Live birth rate per frozen-thawed embryo

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Post-thaw survival of thawed embryos (the percentage of intact blastomeres on the total number of blastomeres present before freezing) 2. Post-thaw development of embryos after overnight culture 3. Implantation rate per transferred embryo 4. Ongoing pregnancy rate per thawing cycle 5. Live birth rate per transferred embryo

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026