Asthma Respiratory
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Aged >= 18 years 2. Have a diagnosed respiratory condition and take an inhaler regularly 3. Able to provide e-consent 4. Able to understand and complete the clinical case scenarios
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Inability to understand or comply with study procedures and/or inability to give fully informed consent.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Measured by questionnaire at point of questionnaire completion: 1. The number and proportion of participants preferring high or low carbon inhalers 2. The number and proportion of participants who think carbon footprint should be included in inhaler choice discussions 3. The number and proportion of participants who would be willing to change their inhaler to a lower carbon option | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Measured by questionnaire at point of questionnaire completion: 1. The rank order of preference of the following factors in carbon-containing and non-carbon containing groups: Cost of the inhaler, Carbon footprint of the inhaler, How many times a day the inhaler needs to be used, The view of the healthcare professional prescribing the inhaler 2. With sensitivity analyses of the order of preference for the following factors in both groups: Age, Respiratory condition, Level of education attainment, Number of inhalers used by the participant, Length of time participant has been using inhalers 3. The number and proportion of participants who are aware of the environmental impact of inhalers 4. The number and proportion of participants matching the inhaler carbon footprint to the equivalent car journey 5. The rank order of preference of the following options in the provision of inhaler carbon footprint: By the healthcare professional prescribing the inhaler, as gCO2Eq on the inhaler packaging, access to a website displaying the carbon footprint of all inhalers, by the pharmacist when collecting prescriptions, would not want to receive the information 6. The rank order of preference of the following options of how inhaler carbon footprint should be made available : By using a traffic light system to demonstrate high/medium/low carbon footprints, As an exact value (in grams of carbon dioxide equivalent), Using everyday measures as a comparator, Would not want to receive the information 7. The proportion of participants that try to recycle their inhalers. 8. The proportion of participants that would use inhaler recycling facilities if available | — |
Countries
United Kingdom