Skip to content

Enhancing the quality of user involved care planning in mental health services (EQUIP)

Enhancing the quality of user involved care planning in mental health services (EQUIP): clinical randomised controlled trial and process evaluation - cluster cohort randomised controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ISRCTN
Registry ID
ISRCTN16488358
Enrollment
480
Registered
2014-05-14
Start date
2014-07-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-02-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Topic: Mental Health

Interventions

Current interventions as of 01/06/2015: The basic design will involve a conventional cluster cohort. We will randomise community mental health teams to either the intervention (training in care plann

Sponsors

Manchester Mental Health & Social Care Trust (UK)
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Current inclusion criteria as of 01/06/2015: All community mental health teams (and health professionals therein) within the 10 mental health trust locations will be eligible for inclusion. Service users aged 18 and over with a severe mental illness (e.g., psychosis, manic depressive illness) under the care of participating community mental health teams will be eligible for inclusion for both the cluster cohort sample and cluster cross sectional sample. However, those who participate in the cluster cohort sample will not be eligible to also take part in the cluster cross sectional sample. Service users will be asked at the point of consent to identify a carer that might be willing to be included in the study. All carers over the age of 18 will be eligible for inclusion in the cluster cohort study. All service users and carers who consent to the cluster cohort study will be eligible to take part in the process evaluation. All professionals in the relevant community mental health teams will be eligible to take part in the process evaluation. Previous inclusion criteria: All community teams and rehabilitation inpatient facilities (and health professionals therein) within the Manchester and Nottingham locations will be eligible for inclusion. Service users aged 18 and over with a severe mental illness (e.g., psychosis, manic depressive illness) under the care of participating community teams and rehabilitation inpatient facilities will be eligible for inclusion for both the cluster cohort sample and cluster cross sectional sample. However, those who participate in the cluster cohort sample will not be eligible to also take part in the cluster cross sectional sample. Service users will be asked at the point of consent to identify a carer that might be willing to be included in the study. All carers over the age of 18 will be eligible for inclusion in the cluster cohort study. All service users and carers who consent to the cluster cohort study will be eligible to take part in the process evaluation. All professionals in the relevant community teams and rehabilitation inpatient facilities will be eligible to take part in the process evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Current exclusion criteria as of 01/06/2015: Service users will be excluded if their participation is judged as inappropriate by clinical staff within the relevant community mental health teams . The principal exclusion criteria will be an inability to provide informed consent. We will seek to document all exclusions and report them as part of the trial CONSORT diagram. Previous exclusion criteria: Service users will be excluded if their participation is judged as inappropriate by clinical staff within the relevant community teams and rehabilitation inpatient facilities. The principal exclusion criteria will be an inability to provide informed consent. We will seek to document all exclusions and report them as part of the trial CONSORT diagram.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ-10, Ludman et al., 2002); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up 6 months later

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. A measure of health service contacts (service use questionnaire); timepoint(s): baseline and 6 months follow-up 2. California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS - Gaston and Marmar 1994); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 3. Carers and Users' Expectations of Services - carer version (CUES-C, Lelliott et al., 1999); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 4. Developing Recovery Enhancing Environments Measure (DREEM - Ridway and Press 2004); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 5. Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale (GASS - Waddell and Taylor 2008); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 6. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS, Zigmond and Snaith 1983); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 7. PROM (User Carer involvement in care planning); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 8. The EQ-5D-5L (Janssen et al., 2012); timepoint(s): baseline and 6 months follow-up 9. Verona service satisfaction scale (VSSS - EU-54, Ruggeri and Dall'Agnola (1993)); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 10. Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS -Tennant et al., 2007); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months 11. World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF - WHO 2004); timepoint(s): baseline and follow-up at 6 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ISRCTN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026